Standard of Care -- is not working...

Some things that may help you .... 

Once upon a time - it came to be, that learned men of high moral character devoted their lives to the study and lawful practice of medicine...    Then, the Lord God Almighty rewarded them with discoveries to share with others worthy of receiving the benefits of God's teachings, through such learned men...   Yet the deception and greed of a few lead to the failure and loss of this shared knowledge...  So that now we live with doubt and some self-centered views in the field of Medicine upon the earth!  

   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Iodine makes everything work better. it is the anti-pharmedico. this is funny because it used to be the only thing doctors had that really worked and they used it on everything and people thought that doctors walked on water as opposed to quacks and saw-bones and a side business for barbers. 

a note from a blog user... 

   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 mjj,

Iodine cured 30 years of asthma and also cured my prostate, dandruff, stinkin feet, fungus toenails, erectile dysfunction. 

Best thing that ever happened to me !

Also, 3 cheers for Trapper, Wombat, Ginagirl & Mr. V for keeping this forum alive for over 7 great years !

And with special appreciation for Wombat's special blend of Iodine cream and salve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How is it that we seem to chase after the Big Medico system without any questions?

 **  Success comes when you get your act together and repent or change your past! 

Much of our problems come from Greed  - because self centerness is the cause for most of the world's problems and troubles....

Why people can worship these greedy -  folks today, I do not understand...

How far we have fallen.  

The wonderful Medical Standard of Care is not as good as they say... 

***  

• © 2009 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

What Does the Medical Profession Mean By “Standard of Care?”

1. Dirk C. Strauss and 
2. J. Meirion Thomas

+Author Affiliations

1. Melanoma/Sarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

To the Editor:

We searched for the exact phrase “standard of care” in the 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting Abstracts and found that the term has been used in a total of 70 abstracts covering a wide range of subjects. It is not our intention to judge whether or not the phrase was justified in each setting, and indeed, we are not qualified to do so. However, because the term standard of care is now used so freely in everyday medical discussion, we thought it could be useful to review its derivation, legal implication and how it relates to allied terms such as guidelines and consensus statements, all of which are continuously evolving as new evidence accumulates.

There is no medical definition for standard of care, although the term is firmly established in law and is defined as “the caution that a reasonable person in similar circumstances would exercise in providing care to a patient.”¹ The term represents an essential component of an action in medical malpractice in proof that the doctor in question failed to provide the required standard of care under the circumstances. In wider terms, a physician has a duty to exercise the degree of care expected of a minimally competent physician in the same specialty and under the same circumstances. As far back as 1860, the Supreme Court of Illinois issued its first decision on what constitutes standard of care.² The lawsuit claimed that a physician, who was represented by a then-practicing attorney Abraham Lincoln, had been negligent for improperly applying a plaster cast. The court declared, “When a person assumes the profession of physician and surgeon, he must…be held to employ a reasonable amount of skill and care.” Currently, the standard of care in a malpractice case is established through the testimony of physicians who are considered experts in the field relating to the specific malpractice case. The Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc³ held that expert testimony must meet two requirements. Firstly, the evidence presented must be shown to constitute scientific knowledge, and secondly, the evidence must be relevant to the case in question. The Supreme Court further identified a number of factors that may be used to determine whether evidence submitted as scientific knowledge is valid. This includes whether the theory or technique has been tested as scientifically valid, whether the idea has been subjected to scientific peer review or published in scientific journals, whether the theory or technique is generally accepted as valid by the relevant scientific community, and whether standards have been circulated to govern the operation of the technique and the known or potential rate of error involved in the technique. It focuses on methodology and principles, not only on the ultimate conclusions generated.³

Traditionally, the standard of care in English law has been determined according to the Bolam test. The locus classicus of the test for the standard of care required from a doctor has developed from the landmark case Bolam v Frien Hospital.⁴ This widely known case defined one component of a negligent act, namely a breach in standard of care expected from a medical professional. The principal criticism of the Bolam test is that it has extended beyond its intended limits, and allows the standard in law to be set subjectively by expert witnesses. In the case of Maynard,⁵ Lord Scarman stated that: “For the realm of diagnosis and treatment, negligence is not established by preferring one respectable body of professional opinion to another.” In an attempt to compensate for this shortcoming, judgment given by the House of Lords in the recent case of Bolitho⁶ imposes a requirement that the standards proclaimed must be justified on a logical basis and must have considered the risks and benefits of competing options. Thus with no clear medical definition for standard of care, it remains unclear how this mainly legal concept of standard of care weighs up and compares in status to consensus statements or clinical guidelines that are secured in evidence-based medicine and produced by a representative organization or authoritative medical body.

========================================================

   How about Standard of care in other areas? 

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then Education today...

The education system has placed kids which are home schooled with a cyber charter school so all their lessons are online and classes are like skype meetings... its very cool.

 Instead of exploiting the special ed kids or those with IEPs for financial gain, they push kids to do more so they perform better and get a better standing so they can qualify for more federal money.

The teachers comment on almost everything.. and by law i have to have a phone meeting with them once every 2 weeks. Its still better than public school.

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 ** Here is another alternate health care site that may help you get better...

Zapper    @ http://paradevices.com/

The "Parasite Zapper" was introduced by Dr. Hulda Clark who has stated in her book "Cure for All Diseases" that it can provide relief from many illnesses caused by parasites such as giardia, cryptosporidium, flukes, other colon parasites and intestinal parasites in humans and in other animals. This in turn, she claimed, could help the body's immune system fight cancer and other serious diseases.


Because the internet is loaded with a lot of confusing and contradictory information about the Hulda Clark Zapper, this site presents some very important information about the zapper, Hulda Clark, and parasites, as well as how to find the best zapper for you and where to buy. This information includes over 80 pages of articles about zappers and zapping with various maladies and also provides a free e-book PDF download on "How to Zap" as well as a real book that thoroughly covers zapping, including what not to do and what is best to do.

The zapper is not a faith based instrument nor is it a scam. It is easily demonstrated that at the very minimum, a good zapper, such as ParaZapper™ CC2, using Low Voltage Pulsed Electric Fields ( LVPEF ), will directly kill microbes such as bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and other microbial organisms that may be parasitic or pathogenic in nature, possibly even the virus. It is also believed but not proven, that zappers can not only kill microbes but, through the use of vibratory stimulation, may also help boost the immune system.

Below, you will find a menu of over 80 topics that include stories of how zappers have helped, as well as actual statistical data on how well zappers have worked for users of some older models of zapper. You will also find some links to other sites that provide additional information on Dr. Clark, her methods, how successful she has been, and the efforts to suppress and defame her work. You may also read about certain zappers that you might wish to avoid.

You will also find information on other important topics ranging from alternatives such as colloidal silver to certain vitamins that can actually help you to live as much as 20 years longer. While you are here, we certainly encourage you to buy and read our book "Parasite Zapping and the Zapper" as it helps us to keep this page running.

Also, you will find a link below to sign our petition to Congress to have the FDA allow free access to zappers for those who want them. The FDA and the FTC have been trying to suppress zappers since they were first introduced. 

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**  Check out this site also      curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1615107

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  

**  Another word of caution!  

I would be very wary of alkalizing solutions. They could have undesired effects on the body. Your body is very capable of reaching the optimal acid/alkaline ratio on it's own with very little help as long as you feed it the proper food.   No doubt using food to alkalize is the very best way. And the food has nutrients in it that we need.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Back with more stuff to help later.....